# Help Me Prioritize

> Ranks tasks or goals based on importance, urgency, and leverage

**Category:** Utility
**Keywords:** priority, prioritize, rank, important, urgent, leverage, focus, tasks, goals
**URL:** https://complete.tools/help-me-prioritize

## How it works

The tool ranks tasks using a weighted scoring system that combines the values of importance, urgency, and leverage. Each task is assigned a score based on the formula: Score = (Importance * Weight_Importance) + (Urgency * Weight_Urgency) + (Leverage * Weight_Leverage). Default weights can be set to reflect user preferences or organizational standards. After calculating the scores for all tasks, the tool sorts them in descending order, allowing users to see which tasks should be prioritized based on the calculated scores.

## Who should use this

1. Project managers assessing project milestones against deadlines and resource availability. 2. Software developers prioritizing bug fixes based on user impact and release schedules. 3. Marketing teams evaluating campaign tasks based on urgency and overall brand strategy. 4. Academic researchers ranking research activities based on funding deadlines and publication goals.

## Worked examples

Example 1: A project manager has three tasks: A (Importance: 8, Urgency: 6, Leverage: 9), B (Importance: 5, Urgency: 9, Leverage: 4), and C (Importance: 7, Urgency: 4, Leverage: 6). Using weights of 1 for Importance, 1.5 for Urgency, and 2 for Leverage, the scores are calculated as follows: Task A: (8*1) + (6*1.5) + (9*2) = 8 + 9 + 18 = 35. Task B: (5*1) + (9*1.5) + (4*2) = 5 + 13.5 + 8 = 26. Task C: (7*1) + (4*1.5) + (6*2) = 7 + 6 + 12 = 25. Thus, the priority order is A, B, C.

Example 2: A marketing team has tasks: X (Importance: 9, Urgency: 4, Leverage: 10), Y (Importance: 6, Urgency: 7, Leverage: 5), and Z (Importance: 5, Urgency: 8, Leverage: 6). With weights of 1, 1.2, and 1.5, the scores are: Task X: (9*1) + (4*1.2) + (10*1.5) = 9 + 4.8 + 15 = 28.8. Task Y: (6*1) + (7*1.2) + (5*1.5) = 6 + 8.4 + 7.5 = 21.9. Task Z: (5*1) + (8*1.2) + (6*1.5) = 5 + 9.6 + 9 = 23.6. Therefore, the priority order is X, Z, Y.

## Limitations

The tool has specific limitations including: 1. Subjective input values can lead to inconsistent prioritization if not calibrated correctly. 2. The scoring formula assumes linear relationships between importance, urgency, and leverage, which may not capture complex interdependencies. 3. Edge cases, such as tasks with identical scores, may require additional criteria for resolution. 4. The default weights may not fit all contexts, potentially skewing results if not adjusted. 5. The model does not account for external factors like resource availability or team capacity, which could affect task execution.

## FAQs

**Q:** How are the weights for importance, urgency, and leverage determined?


**A:** Weights can be set based on user-defined criteria or industry standards, reflecting the relative significance of each factor in prioritization.


**Q:** Can the tool handle tasks with multiple dependencies?


**A:** The tool does not inherently account for task dependencies; it evaluates each task independently based on input values.


**Q:** Is there a way to modify the scoring formula?


**A:** Users can customize the weights used in the scoring formula, but the fundamental calculation structure remains constant for consistency.


**Q:** How does the tool accommodate changing priorities?


**A:** Users can re-input task values and re-calculate scores at any time, allowing for dynamic adjustments to prioritize tasks as conditions change.

---

*Generated from [complete.tools/help-me-prioritize](https://complete.tools/help-me-prioritize)*